Seattle Genetics at ASH 2007 – SGN-33 (part I)


Seattle Genetics (SGEN) recently published clinical data from a phase I which evaluated SGN-33 for the treatment of elderly AML (Acute Myelogenous Leukemia) patients. AML is a common type of blood cancer, with around 13,000 new cases and 9000 deaths expected to occur during 2007 in the US alone. The prognosis elderly AML patients have can be attributed to their inability to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy or stem cell transplant. Moreover, AML among elderly patients is inherently more resistant to standard chemotherapy due to several factors.Therefore, there is a unique challenge in developing better treatments for elderly AML patients, because these treatments must be very safe in addition to being effective. Antibodies, as well as other targeted therapies are regarded as excellent candidates, as they have an excellent safety profile and can be usually co-administered with other treatments. The market opportunity for such treatments is substantial, due to the high incidence of AML among elderly patients, so naturally there are multiple treatments currently being evaluated. The majority of these treatments are chemo agents but there are several targeted therapies, the most promising of which is SGN-33.


SGN-33 is a naked antibody that specifically binds the CD33 receptor, which is highly expressed in the vast majority of AML cases. Fortunately, stem cells in the bone marrow don’t express CD33, making the targeting of CD33 very attractive. In addition, CD33 has already been validated as a target for antibody-based therapy by Wyeth’s (WYE) Mylotarg, an anti-CD33  Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). SGN-33 is a very interesting antibody since it has a dual mechanism of action (MOA). The first MOA is the recruitment of components of the immune system that attack and destroy cells bound by the antibody. This MOA is very common among cancer antibodies such as Herceptin and Rituxan. The second MOA, is the activation of the CD33 receptor which leads to a change in gene expression that results in “weakening” of the cancer cells.


According to the results presented in ASH 2007, SGN-33 is highly effective among elderly AML patients. Among the 17 evaluable AML patients, 5 (29%) achieved complete response and two patients (11%) achieved partial response. The average age of the 5 patients who achieved CR was 78 years, very impressive considering the inverse relation between age and response rate in AML. Since this was a dose escalation study, 4 doses were evaluated, and interestingly, there was no typical dose dependent response, as there was at least one CR in every cohort.

SGN-33 seems to have an excellent safety profile, as no MTD was reached, even at the highest dose (8 mg/kg), which is considered fairly high compared to other antibody regimens. As discussed above, the safety issue in older AML patients is crucial, since these patients are intolerant to aggressive therapies.  Of note, the dosing in this trial was quite intense, with 5 consecutive weekly doses followed by additional 5 bi-weekly administrations of SGN-33.The only substantial side effect was seen in 2 patients, however, this specific side effect is more likely to be attributed to the disease rather than to the drug itself. Althogh SGN-33 is not the only candidate that is in clinical trials, on the next post, I’ll try to explain why it is the safest bet among all other candidates. It doesn’t mean SGN-33 is a sure bet, but it does mean it has high chances of becoming a standard component in the majority of AML regimens, with potential in additional conditions such as MDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome). 

Author is long SGEN

1 thought on “Seattle Genetics at ASH 2007 – SGN-33 (part I)

  1. Although elderly patients can suffer from resistant AML, there are herbal therapies that can compensate for defects in apoptosis signaling pathways – those very defects that confer resistance to the cancer cells. Combined with other herbal therapies that leverage immune system components to produce cytokines and stimulate macrophage, T-Cell, and NK cell activity – these herbal therapies can cure the most resistant AML.

    Case in point: My son Jaymun, born with congenital AML, 3 rounds of chemo, conditioning, BMT in 2006 – relapse in 2008 – two more rounds of chemo – three months of CNS intrathecal chemo – sent home July 31,2008 with refractory AML (CNS and marrow involvement). 5+ months later we achieved remission using exclusively an herbal protocol.

    See story and medical records at


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s